Enzyme Lab Worksheet
Hypothesis: My hypothesis is that the acidic solution will speed up and increase the process, thus creating more bubbles.
Independent Variable: The pH level of the solution and the amount that we add to the bindweed solution.
Dependent Variable: The amount of bubbles produced by the mixture once the hydrogen peroxide is added.
Controlled Variables: Amount of the different solutions and the acidity of them that we add.
Justification of hypothesis: The low pH level burns skin so I thought it would kill the enzymes.
Why did you choose this as your hypothesis?
Materials (Your Team’s Experiment): test tube, metric ruler, stopwatch (iphone), bindweed, hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, water, mortar and pestle, 1 milliliter pipettes, beakers.
Procedure:
- Mash up one handful of bindweed with 30 ml of water in a mortar and pestle
- filter using a paper towel into a separate glass, throw away paper towel
- tape ruler, metric side, to test tube
- extract 1 ml of bindweed solution into test tube
- extract .7 ml of hydrogen peroxide into same test tube
- observe bubbles and and time the rate of formation
- record information
- with a new test tube repeat steps 1-4
- add .5 ml of hydrochloric acid to the bindweed solution
- repeat step 5-7
- with a new test tube repeat steps 1-4
- add .5 ml of sodium hydroxide to bindweed solution
- repeat steps 5-7
- write out lab report
- clean up lab space
Summary: When we tested all of our different solutions, we realized that the control actually created the biggest reaction and the most bubbles.
Data and Results:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyDeleteEnzyme Lab e-Report Evaluation Summary: Zach W
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: 1.5/2 (“Worksheet” should not be in the title of a formal lab report)
Introduction: 0/2 (None found)
Purpose: 0/2 (None found)
Hypothesis: 1.5/2 (You did not refer to what you were actually testing on [the peroxidase enzyme])
Materials: 2/2 ()
Procedure: 9/10 (procedure could stand to be a bit more detailed)
Observations/Data: 5/10 (No raw data, only a graph)
Data Analysis: 0/10 (none shown, but some mention in discussion)
Discussion: 2/10 (Future experiments? Unanswered questions? Improvements to this experiment?)
TOTAL: 21/50
COMMENTS: See above